Tuesday, 4 February 2014

Factors Influencing The Financial Crisis That Affect Small & Medium-Sized Construction Enterprises In Thailand

Construction plays a vital role in economic growth and development. It is also important in terms of satisfying basic physical and social needs for a greater standard of living. ILO (1987) stated that construction is one of the few industries that is of common importance in all countries and is recognized as a great contributor to the national economies of all countries. Construction stimulates a sizeable amount of economic growth because the development of the construction industry supports other considerable industries such as manufacturing and real estate.

The construction industry, through the products that it creates, its size, and its ability to create employment, is likely to influence an economy’s gross domestic product (GDP) more than any other service industry (Love et al., 2004). In Thailand, the construction industry is a major component and greatly influences the economic growth. It is interesting to note that even though being an enormous industry, construction relies much on small and medium-sized construction enterprises or “construction SMEs”. Construction SMEs are not only the grass-roots of Thailand’s construction industry; they also play a significant role to drive the construction business which has the potential to develop the country. Office of SMEs promotion in Thailand (2001) promoted that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have been accepted as significant players and are the majority of business enterprises and comprise an important component for developing the economy and society of all nations. The information from National Statistic Office of Thailand (NSO, 2004), using the number of employees as the measure of size, reports that SMEs represent 98 percent of construction enterprises. In addition, construction SMEs have the financial volume approximately three times that of large construction enterprises. These distinguish how SMEs are important for construction but most construction firms are classified as SMEs.

Ms. Chanagarn Watanantachai made a study which aimed to investigate factors influencing the financial crisis that is affecting construction SMEs in Thailand so that the effective recommendations for financial crisis management could be proposed for minimize and prevent them from getting into a crisis. To achieve her objective, her sub-objectives were identified as follows: (1) to identify the key factors that lead to financial crisis and classify the importance level of each factor; (2) to explore and gain in-depth understanding how key factors influencing the financial crisis base on the practices of construction SMEs; and (3) to propose recommendations for financial crisis management that are appropriate for construction SMEs in handling with key factors influencing the financial crisis.

Results

In achieving the first objective, the analysis framework consists of 6 analysis processes. The first process is to identify the definition of factors influencing the financial crisis that is affecting construction SMEs in Thailand by using literature review and interview the managing directors. The researcher gets 33 factors that influence the financial crisis from interview expert compound with internal factors and external factors. The internal factors are included with the analysis of factors from Business Management, Financial and Accounting, Marketing, and Construction. The external factors are included with the analysis of factors from Financial Institute, Client, Supplier, Sub-contractor, and Environment .

The first objective was accomplished by using two statistic methods: 1) descriptive analysis (mean and ranking) for classifying the importance level of each factor and 2) hypothesis testing (T-test) for test the perception difference between construction SMEs with financial problem and construction SMEs without financial problem.

According to a descriptive analysis of the sample results, the main factors (the first top 10 ranked) influencing the financial crisis that is affecting construction SMEs in Thailand are Economic downturn, Payment delay from client, Increasing in construction costs, Politic instability, High competition, Unable to access sources of funds, Insufficient funds and limited capital, Low price bidding to get projects, Under-table expense for client, and Cash flow shortage. All top 10 factors are classified as a high importance level for influencing the financial crisis. There are 7 factors (out of top ten) from external factors which are difficult to control. The others 3 factors (out of top ten) are from internal factors. The groups of external factors and internal factors are shown below:

External factor
· From environment: Economic downturn, Politic instability and High competition
· From client: Payment delay from client and Under-table expense for client
· From supplier: Increasing in construction costs
· From financial institute: Unable to access sources of funds

Internal factor
From finance: Insufficient funds and limited capital and Cash flow shortage
From marketing: Low price bidding to get projects

In order to achieve the second objective of this study, factor analysis was used to explore and gain in-depth understanding how key factors influencing the financial crisis from the practices of construction SMEs. From factor analysis, the 33 factors influencing the financial crisis were classified into 7 groups of key factors: Adverse Effects of the Nation’s Situation, Less Profit or Making Loss, Low Cash Liquidity, Poor Credit Potential, Deficiency in Knowledge and Experience, Improper Contract Administration, , and construction project problems. The relationship and logical framework for summer of key factors that is influencing the financial crisis was illustrated in figure 1.



Figure 1. Logical Framework for Summer of Key Factors that is Influencing the Financial Crisis

Finally, the summary of interrelationship frameworks that demonstrate how key factors influencing the financial crisis are developed as illustrated in figure 2.



Figure 2. Summary of Interrelationship Framework of Key Factors that is Influencing the
Financial Crisis

Recommendations for Improvement

For achieving the final objective of this study, the last research objective is completed by proposing the recommendation for financial crisis management that are appropriate for construction SMEs. The causes, consequences, and recommendation for handling with the 10 key factors were discussed in table 1.



Her thesis abstract is copied and posted.

ABSTRACT

Construction SMEs are a backbone of the construction industry in Thailand. Unfortunately, construction SMEs have extremely high uncertainty and risk that lead them face with financial crisis and business failure easily and they can lead to failure of the Thai construction industry. Therefore, it is necessary to have a study concerned with financial crisis in order to know what factors lead construction SMEs to get into a financial crisis. This study aims to investigate key factors that influencing the financial crisis that is affecting construction SMEs in Thailand and recommend the effective method for financial crisis management.

The researcher decided to use 2 types of research design: 1) quantitative research by using survey design and 2) qualitative research by using case study. There are 3 statistic methods were used to analyze data from questionnaire surveys: 1) descriptive analysis (mean and ranking) for classifying the importance level of each factor, 2) hypothesis testing (T-test) for test the perception difference between construction SMEs with financial problem and construction SMEs without financial problem, and 3) factor analysis for reducing set of factors. For qualitative study, the case study was used to gain in-depth understanding how key factors influencing the financial crisis base on the practices of construction SMEs.

Results were found that there are 10 key factors that influencing the financial crisis: Economic downturn, Payment delay from client, Increasing in construction costs, Politic instability, High competition, Unable to access sources of funds, Insufficient funds and limited capital, Low price bidding to get projects, Under-table expense for client, and Cash flow shortage. The causes, consequences, and recommendation for handling with the 10 key factors were discussed in this study.

Sunday, 26 January 2014

AIT alumnus appointed Deputy Minister in Vietnam

An alumnus of the Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Dr. Cao Quoc Hung has been appointed as Deputy Minister, Ministry of Industry and Trade in Vietnam.

for detail information, please visit:

- http://www.ait.ac.th/news-and-events/2014/news/ait-alumnus-appointed-deputy-minister-in-vietnam/view#.UuTebvb-JYC

- http://www.vietnambreakingnews.com/2014/01/pm-appoints-new-deputy-trade-minister/#.UuHj8KU44lI

- www.moit.gov.vn/en/Pages/Leaders.aspx

Thursday, 23 January 2014

Saturday, 18 January 2014

Visit Mekong Delta January 2014

Mekong Delta visit
January 2014

At the beginning of the year 2014, MPM program representative, Dr. Hadikusumo, had a visit to two Mekong Delta provinces: Bac Lieu and Tra Vinh.
- Bac Lieu Department of Planning and Investment and Bac Lieu University; 
- Tra Vinh Management Board of Tra Vinh Economic Zone and Tra Vinh Board of Project Management of Investment and Construction
The very good results of those fruitful meetings have promised to bring bright near future for coming corporations between MPM/AIT and those provinces. Once MPM program can be launched at their places, it will take a part to contribute for the province sustainable development with higher quality human resource, esp. in construction project management field. We believe that as what we have being done for Can Tho, Vung Tau, Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh city since 2007. 


Dr. Hadikusumo, MPM (left) and Mr. Pham Thanh Hien, Vice Director of Bac Lieu Department of Planning and Investment 
Dr. Hadikusumo, MPM (left) and Mr. Tran Manh Hung, Vice-Rector, Bac Lieu University
Dr. Hadikusumo, MPM (left) and Mr. Le Van Kham, Management Board of Tra Vinh Economic Zone 
Dr. Hadikusumo, MPM (left) and Mr. Vuong Hai Khoa, Director of  Tra Vinh Board of Project Management of Investment and Construction

Monday, 13 January 2014

Development Infrastructure Program To Support For Van Don Economic Zone

The growth of project finance over the last 20 years has been driven mainly by the worldwide process of deregulation of utilities and privatization of public sector capital investment. This has taken place both in the developed world as well as developing countries. It has also been promoted by the internationalization of investment in major projects: leading project developers now run worldwide portfolios and are able to apply the lessons learned from one country to projects in another, as are their banks and financial advisers. Governments and the public sector generally also benefit from these exchanges of experience.

Private finance for public infrastructure projects is not a new concept: the English road system was renewed in the 18th and early 19th centuries using private sector funding based on toll revenues; the railway, water, gas, electricity, and telephone industries were developed around the world in the 19th century mainly with private-sector investment. During the first half of the 20th century, however, the state took over such activities in many countries, and only over the last 20 years has this process been reversing. Project finance, as an appropriate method of longterm financing for capital-intensive industries where the investment financed has a relatively predictable cash flow, has played an important part in providing the funding required for this change.

Infrastructure plays an important role in development Socioeconomic. It contributed greatly to the economic development of Vietnam and Economic zones. In recent years, infrastructure system in Vietnam has appeared more limited. This is a bad influence on the economy. This fact is determined by the following basic reasons:
  • Planning and implementation of the plan lacks predictability, synchronization.
  • The rapid growth of the economy leads to overloading of the system infrastructure. while capital investment is limited.
  • The project was implemented by the state less effective. This is the cause of slow progress and quality of projects.

PHAM VAN THANH conducted a case study which objectives were to:

1. Investigate and identify key infrastructure for developing Van Don economic zone. Estimation general cost and soure of fund for infrastructure system.

2. Determine the overall progress of the program and Analyzing the feasibility of the program and the critical difficulties in capital investment.

3. Propose solution recommendations in field of fund and legal for performance the program from the state authority’s point of view for developing infrastructure system.

Conclusion

The case study had analyzed the development of infrastructure at the Van Don economic zone, which is defined as dynamic economic development and regional areas. The analysis shows that:
  • Infrastructure development plays a decisive role in the development of economic zones in particular and economic sector in general.
  • The investment in infrastructure construction needs a large and sustained fund. while the project is long cycle life, many risks, capital recovery is slow, less attractive to investors.
  • At the macro level, Government will play a major role in investment and development of public infrastructure, because the investment in infrastructure development is low financial benefit but high in Socio-economic benefits and security social welfare.
  • But, state funding is not enough, thereby diversifying investments fund is necessary solutions for allocation the risk of capital scarcity in the future.

Besides making uniformity of implementation planning. Analysis to develop sustainable financial resources for infrastructure development is a critical condition.

Diversify forms of capital to increase capacity to mobilize capital in the application of financial modeling is essential.

Special issue of privatization, project finance, public private partnership should be carefully considered depending on the maturity level of the economy as well as the sustained commitment of the government through the mechanism management.

Advanced methods can be successfully applied in developed countries but by no means will succeed when brought into Vietnam without appropriate adjustments, there are reasons for differences in the provisions of policies and economic conditions - social, especially when developed countries already have experience and maturity level of the market economy.

The adoption and implementation of the program should have a general policy relating to the all political system in which government plays a key role in forming the mechanism.


1. For Improving Developing Infrastructure Program

Within the scope of research at the Van Don economic zone, the author proposes three other group solutions in policy mechanisms to ensure the viability of the programs. The solution set to ensure the following objectives:

1. Source of State Capital Financial Risk
2. Government Support Public Infrastructure investors
3. Government Support Business investors
(Source of State Capital and Financial Risk)

  • Government need approves the plan capital allocated for investment in infrastructure of Van Don economic zone in a 5-year cycle. This program needs to be passed by National Assembly.
  • Government should allow Quang Ninh province actively planning and using land  fund along the highway to create capital from land use fees for development infrastructure.
  • Allows the Quang Ninh province keep and use tax revenues in Van Don EZ to invest in infrastructure construction.

This policy will ensure the resources of the state capital and overcome the risks of capital investment

2. Government Support Public Infrastructure investors

  • Complete planning and publicizing a list of infrastructure projects, which required investment.
  • Government should issued legal and Regulatory Framework of PPP, PF, Concession model. To ensure the objectives of attracting private sector capital in the country and foreign investment in developing infrastructure to provide public services.
  • Governments should publicly the commitment when establish forms of cooperation in Public-Private Partnership or Private public infrastructure project.
  • Create all favorable conditions and methods to ensure the recoverability capital and interest of enterprise or SPV company.

3. Government Support Business investors

Development of infrastructure for economic and social development. Economic and social development, business development is the key to making business  in public infrastructure success. Thus promoting business investment has an important role and as a result but also the cause of infrastructure investment.
  • Special tax incentives for investment projects in the VDEZ, profit repatriation and reinvestment incentives.
  • Special land tax and leasing rates.
  • Simplified and fast approval process for key development initiatives.
  • Special incentives and simplified approval process for foreign skilled workers.
  • Land allocation complete with infrastructural facilities provided to expedite development.
  • A more liberal policy on housing ownership and lease arrangements for Vietnamese, Overseas Vietnamese residents, Permanent Residents and Foreign Investors.
  • A Preferential policy to regulate sources of revenue and increase reinvestment capital.
  • To establish special development funds to promote development initiatives in Van Don.
Abstract

Vietnam is developing country having population of about 90 millions. From 90s year of 20th century, After 20 years of renovation, Vietnam has achieved important milestone in economic development, politics, society as well as foreign affairs such as remaining sustainable and high development rate (average 10% per year), stable politics, attractive and potential market to foreign investors. Nowadays, Vietnam has become member of UN, WTO and many international organizations and forums, especially playing important role in ASEAN. Vietnam has never have great opportunities and challenges to develop country like now.      

Vietnam also located in trading hub area and economical corridors of region. In order to utilize such advantages with consideration to importance of economical integration to provide equal development in country wide, Vietnam has established 15 costal economical zones in decision 1353/QD-TTg dated 23 September 2008. It will be cores and driving forces for economic development of Vietnam.

However, one of basic and key matter obstructing the development of Vietnam like other economies also, is the lack of financial capital to improve the shorted infrastructures Providing proper policies and directions to mobilize capital sources investing in infrastructure development in economic zones is the key of Vietnamese economic development policy to promote the effects of such economic zones.

This research focus study on Van Don economic zone of Quang Ninh province, which is one of costal economic zone established in year 2007 according to decision 120/QD-TTg dated 26 July 2007, and having administrative and natural area of 2171km2 and 553km2 respectively. It is northern costal economic zone having many potentials regarding to tourist, luxury recreational, industry and high-tech industry, and free trade. Study of mechanism, funding program of infrastructure development support for this economic zone is the objective of this research.

Wednesday, 8 January 2014

Improvement of Organizational Structure for Power Plant Project Management of PetroVietnam

Electric energy is crucial for the development of Vietnam. From 2006-2010, the actual consumption of electric energy is the same with the actual generated net electric energy of about 13.7% per year to gain 85.4 billion KWh in 2010 only. There are many different power sources such as thermal power, hydropower, nuclear power etc. But in Vietnam, country's electricity is mainly produced from thermal power and hydro-power. However, in Vietnam's power system nowadays, the rate and capacity of hydro-power is being decreased if compared to the capacity and other electrical power sources.

The PetroVietnam (PVN) is implementing the accelerated development program. As a leading economic Group in Vietnamese energy sector including search, exploration and exploitation of oil and gas, power generation, PVN is assigned as the big investor of many important projects, including projects on thermal power plants. PVN is also one of the leading biggest Vietnamese State-Owned companies with the aim of looking for investment partners who are reliable and have enough financial capacity and modern technology to develop and build the power plants quickly in order to meet the electricity demand growth in Vietnam.

With this big task, PetroVietnam now is in “hot development” status. PVN has invested & built the first power plant since 2005 with only one Management Board (MB). Now, PVN is managing five thermal power plant projects at the same time. Besides, the objective of MBs is usually changed very fast, but organization structure for all MBs is still same with the first MB in the beginning. Therefore, PVN’s management for power projects still has some outstanding issues which are the weakness in organizational structure for project management. LE ANH THONG made a case study which objectives were to:

1. Deeply understand the existing organizational structure of PVN power plant project to analyze the strength and weakness, advantages & disadvantages of the existing system

2. propose recommendation for improvement

Conclusion

The objectives of Petrovietnam Power Plant Projects (PVN’s PPP) are usually changed very fast, but PVN still has kept the beginning type of organizational structure which is “Functional Structure” from 2004 up to now. Although this structure have some minor advantages, this structure is not suitable with the growth of PVN’s PPP which has caused some weakness and disadvantages in PVN’s PPP management so far. With four individual Management Boards, they have not achieved perfect result, and in case there are complicated tasks such as different features, sizes, location and many changes which are usually very fast and extreme in PVN power plant projects, it is very difficult to control the scope, contingency funds, and overall project value. It is also very difficult to monitor or audit the project’s progress, stakeholder’s commitment, results achieved and the leading indicators of failure, and so on.

Recommendation


The most important advantages of the Proposed Improvement are efficient use  of  resources of the whole Proposed General Management Board where specialized  individuals can be shared and transferred from one it’s Branch to other Branches or among all PVN’s projects. Therefore, the project management cost is minimized; the total quantity management staff shall be decreased, but the professional grade is easily increased, etc. These are the most useful and most efficient in this proposal.

With the detailed analysis and proposal, the strength and advantages of the proposed improvement are very clear and prevailed to compare with its disadvantages. Besides, there has the proposed solution to solve for these disadvantages. Therefore, it should be considered as preliminary study to apply in the PVN’s thermal power project management with the additional study needed.

However, the Proposed Improvement will not be enough to improve everything for PVN’s project management. It is necessary with best effort to apply some more other solution in order to gain actually significant improvement and overcome other outstanding weakness of PVN’s project management.

Abstract

 Electric Power is an essential energy for people’s daily life and one of the major factors in labor productivity growth. It helps to develop the economy of the countries in the world, especially for the developing countries like Vietnam. Consequently, it’s very important to know how to manage power plant projects effectively and successfully. 

PetroVietnam (PVN) who is the biggest Economic Group of Vietnamese State-Owned Groups has been assigned by Government to invest & build some power plants. So it is necessary for PVN to improve their power plant project management. With the scope of my report, I will mention about the improvement for organizational structure of PVN’s thermal power plant project management and my Management Board.

The Objecctive of my Report is the Proposal to improve Organizational Structure of PVN’s PPP to manage PetroVietnam Power Plant Projects (PVN’s PPP), and solve their weakness/disadvantages & gain better effectiveness and success

The reason to find the above Objective are the objectives of PVN’s PPP are usually changed very fast, but PVN still has kept the beginning type of organizational structure from 2004 up to now, and some weakness/disadvantages were found in PVN’s PPP management so far.

Therefore, the case chosen for my report which is the organizational structure of PVN’s PPP.


By the analyses based on theory of organizational structure for project management colland my experience during a long time work in PVN’s PPP, my recommendation of the Proposal in my Report is the application of the Matrix Structure for One General Management Board instead of the Functional Structure used by many PVN’s individual Management Boards that expected to gain the above Objective to PVN’s PPP management