Construction industry has played the vital role in world’s and country’s economic growth. Large construction project such as infrastructure needs to be proposed to cover the national strategic investment and national demand including community needs resulting to the increase in national growth rate. Therefore, infrastructure development and growth rate become linked.
In Thailand, government initiates to invest the physical and social infrastructures in 2008 such as mass transit rail (ADB, 2007). But due to political instability, the construction industry growth is declining. In order to develop successful infrastructure, the attractive alternative for government is to use the privatization approach called called “Public Private Partnerships” (PPP). In this approach, the government will allow the private sector to finance, design, construct and operate depending on the contract or procurement option. The private sectors use their technical and financial expertise to put a viable infrastructure project.
Since Thailand is one of the developing countries that have many infrastructure development projects, the Royal Thai Government (RTG) also has difficulty to propose infrastructure project because the infrastructure development project has high capital investment cost. The public private partnerships are used by RTG or state-own enterprises as the tool to provide the infrastructure service for community. The RTG increased the participation of private sector in infrastructure development.
Therefore, it is important to have a study public private partnerships in order to understand the interactive relationship and risks along development process between public and private sector. By understanding this interaction and risks between public and private sector, the PPP infrastructure projects will be completed with effective and efficient management.
Mr. Thotsaphol Rattananapalai made a study that aimed to investigate the interactive activities, relationships and risks between public and private sector in PPP infrastructure projects.
His results from the data analyses were found that the case study met twenty-six risks along the project development. It has nine, two, one, four, five and five risks in conceptual, tendering, financing, design and planning, construction and operation and maintenance phase, respectively. However, the concession agreement between public and private sector had covered only nine risks without any clause in first four phases. The key activities in PPP project development were found out: demand-supply assessment, signing concession agreement, developing financing plan, procuring outline and definitive design, revenue service commencement and operating and maintaining facilities. Then the key risks were found out: uncertainty of government policy, poor public decision making process, delay in financial closure, unavailability of fund, service commencement delay and revenue shortfall. Finally, the interactive model between public and private sector and risks relationship model were illustrated in this research.
His thesis abstract is copied and posted.
ABSTRACT
Due to increasing of the infrastructure projects, the public private partnership approach is getting more using. However, the public private partnership project development is complicated with the interrelation between public and private sector. For that reason, both public and private sector are getting into many problems along project life cycle. Therefore, it is necessary to have a study concerned with the development of public private partnership project along project life cycle. This research aims to investigate the interaction between public and private sector in project life cycle of PPP project. It also identifies the key risks and key activities along the project development.
In order to achieve the objective of research, the research uses case study approach as a research design. The process begins with framework identification that comprises of activity identification, framework development and framework verification. The selected PPP case study is the first underground mass rapid transit in Thailand. It continues with the data collection that uses the documentation, archival record and interview. The data analysis is conducted towards the case study evidences using explain and describe method to reveal and explain the important evidences.
Results from the analysis were found that the case study met twenty-six risks along the project development. It has nine, two, one, four, five and five risks in conceptual, tendering, financing, design and planning, construction and operation and maintenance phase, respectively. However, the concession agreement between public and private sector had covered only nine risks without any clause in first four phases. The key activities in PPP project development were found out: demand-supply assessment, signing concession agreement, developing financing plan, procuring outline and definitive design, revenue service commencement and operating and maintaining facilities. Then the key risks were found out: uncertainty of government policy, poor public decision making process, delay in financial closure, unavailability of fund, service commencement delay and revenue shortfall. Finally, the interactive model between public and private sector and risks relationship model were illustrated in this research.
No comments:
Post a Comment