Facility construction involves a wide variety of risks. Factors impacting owner investment decisions can be quite complex and may vary significantly from region to region and project to project. Contractors face similar difficulties when they consider working outside of their resident jurisdiction. The risks arise from many areas such as legal requirements, construction systems, technology, and management techniques. The success of a specific venture, and in some cases the viability of an organization, can hinge on an understanding of the risks associated with such projects. Construction projects that fail to meet scope, budget, and schedule can result in a host of impacts with serious economic, social, and political ramifications.
Many experts agreed that the company that earned the highest profit has a good risk management system. Management of Risk (MoR) is not only about avoiding explosions or natural disasters. In fact for most businesses it is about profit. And many businesses do it without really understanding how better risk management could help their organization achieve its goals. Risk management proponents say that the better the organization is at managing risk, the more profitable it will be.
In summary, a certain amount of risk taking is inevitable, and even to be encouraged, if an organization is to achieve its objectives. Objective management and acceptance of risk helps to improve performance by contributing to:
a. Increased certainty and fewer surprises
b. Better service delivery
c. More effective management of change
d. More efficient use of resources
e. Better management at all levels through improved decision making
f. Reduced waste and fraud, and better value for money
g. Innovation
h. Management of contingent and maintenance activities
Although there are many improvements of management in Vietnam, the construction industry still has to face many changes in both market and government policies. The causes are many but one of them is the lack of attentiveness with the important of the risk management process.
Besides, the value of systematic risk management of project activity is not fully recognized by the construction industry (Walewski, et al. 2002). Since no common view of risk exists, owners, investors, designers, and constructors have differing objectives and adverse relationships between the parties are common. Attempts at coordinating risk analysis management between all of the project participants have not been formalized and this is especially true between contractors and owners.
Moreover, the construction engineers were not familiar with the risk management issues and they found it was hard when working in a competitive climate, especially in a project. Because of lack of knowledge of management and risk management, they were not preferred with the relevant works such as planning than the technical issues like designing or calculating structural. Thus it is understandable if they were unaware of risks and less concerned of risk management. Therefore, a study of risks and risk management is necessary and beneficial to all of the construction industry in general and Port & Waterway Projects particularly. In summary, the problems are stated as follow:
§ The ambiguous of risks and risk management of the Vietnamese engineers.
§ The lack of awareness and knowledge of risk management.
Mr. Nguyen Viet Dung made a case study which focused on the management of risks in P&W projects in Southern Focal Economic Area (SFEA). The framework of his research started with the findings of risk management that include risk management planning, risk identification, risk analysis, risk response and risk monitoring and control which followed by the analysis and the discussion. Based on the collected information, improvement suggestions will be made to improve effectiveness in risk management in port and waterway projects in SFEA of Vietnam. His specific objectives were:
§ Finding the potential risks and how are they managed in P&W projects
§ Suggest how to effectively manage risks in port & waterway projects.
His study was conducted with the intention of giving more benefit to the engineers working on P&W projects though it could be useful for other fields of the construction industry. He found out that the most important risks consisted of 1) corruption and bribery, 2) budget viable (contractor), 3) incompetent project team, 4) changes in law and regulation, and 5) inadequate designer.
He investigated two projects were the picture of risk management in P&W projects was clearly defined. In both studied projects, they have formal processes of risk management and are constantly improving by practicing experience. The process consisted of 4 main stages:
1. Risk management planning - although most of interviewees agreed about its importance, it is still not utilized carefully. Project budget and project management plan are important and usually used.
2. Risk identification and analysis - performance is quite fine. A few formal standards have been applied and encouraged the engineers to participate. The project budget is considered as the most concerned subject, while business environment factors are accounted to cope with changes in the market. Tools and techniques which based on historical data and experience are highly utilized. The engineers prefer easy and convenient methods to do their work when it proves useful and is accepted by the authorities.
3. Risk response - mitigation and sharing are mostly utilized and have high effectiveness when these strategies could make the stakeholders reach agreement without arising disputes and losing time. Thus the experts with high skill of negotiation are needed to motivate the relevant parties and ensure the success of the agreement.
4. Risk monitoring and control - though new risks appearing in the project life aren’t identified very well, it is successful in other means. By applying “risk audit” and “technical performance measurement”, the risk responses and risk management process is evaluated and necessary activities will be implemented to ensure the success of achieving the project’s objectives. However new risks could be major problems if they are ignored, especially in complex projects where risks can’t be recognized fully in identification stage. Therefore applying the strategies to continuously uncover the new risks such as “risk reassessment” is suggested to make the risk management process concrete.
At present, risk management is still a new area in the management field. Therefore, facing difficulties are frequent and unavoidable.
Mr. Dung found out that although the founded general attitude was that risk management was already so much of concern. Thus if more effort was put into it, no other work would get done. He also found out that the transferring of risks and risk management knowledge from project to project was poor. The interviewees admitted that even if they proposed a new solution and put serious effort into transferring that knowledge to others, but it would be difficult even within their own organization.
In theory, although many methods of carrying out risk management processes are presented, they were not in practice. Some of the interviewees were working with risk management, and they admitted that they had little knowledge about risk management methods. Professionalism and experience are very important in identifying and managing risks, but it is necessary to encourage larger participants and apply more appropriate tools and techniques.
Formal methods of communicating and of sharing experiences and knowledge of risks and risk management were missing or inadequate. That is why in order to secure the activities of the project, it is important to adapt the most suitable approach. Therefore, risk management courses for all construction project engineers are necessary to increase the level of knowledge of formal risk management processes. Furthermore, understanding its benefits would increase the willingness to invest in risk management and capabilities to do it.
His thesis abstract is copied and posted
Abstract
Project risk management has been a subject of intensive discussion in recent years. Still, research on how project risk management should be adopted is inadequate. The objectives of this study are to identify the risks and how to manage risks in Port and Waterway (P&W) Projects. The focus of the study is on the means for risk management. The purpose is to emphasize the importance and requirement of risk management.
The study was conducted with 7 interviews in two different P&W projects and mainly targeted to the engineers involved in the projects. Literature searches were mostly done by using AIT library materials and databases.
Empirical study was used to show the application area for risk management derived from literature. Based on this, a picture of risk management in P&W projects was formed. The basic idea of the picture is to sensitize the engineers regarding the potential risks and suggest how to manage them. According to the understanding gained during this study, it is suggested that by enabling more caution of risk management methods, project risk management will become more efficient and the inefficient and costly activities identified would be reduced.
No comments:
Post a Comment