Public Private Partnership in Low-Income Housing Development in Vietnam

Infrastructure development plays a vital role in economic growth and poverty reduction (WB, 2003). Traditionally, infrastructure systems have been provided by public sector. However, the increasing need of new infrastructure development and maintenance of existing infrastructure systems demands a huge capital investment which cannot be achieved by public fund. Public-Private Partnership delivery has become a solution for funding problem by mobilizing private sector fund into infrastructure investment (ADB, 2008). With their innovation and management skill, private participation can increase productivity and efficiency of operation, improve the quality of service and reduce service price compared to public sector provision (ADB, 2008).

In order to keep pace with the increase in housing demand and improve poor housing condition, scaling up investment in housing sector is the urgent focus of Vietnamese government. And in order to reduce state budget investment, Vietnam government is currently seeking possible solutions to develop public private partnership in infrastructure investment, and especially in low-income housing development.

Mr. Truong Ngoc Quy made a study which main objective is to propose the possible solution to encourage private participate in low-income housing development in HCMC. In accomplishing the main objective, the following sub-objectives have to achieve:

1. Develop general public private partnership framework in low-income housing development and its assessment criteria.

2. Investigate current practice of public private partnership in low-income housing development in Vietnam using the developed general model

3. Assess current practice of public private partnership of low-income housing development in Vietnam based on developed assessment criteria.

4. Propose the recommendation for setting up applicable public private partnership model in low-income housing development in Vietnam.

Research Findings

1. General public private partnership model in low-income housing development and its assessment criteria

Five factors of PPP in LIH development which are constructed from extensive literature review and expert verification are (1) government support to private participation, (2) government imposition on private party, (3) government subsidies for low-income people, (4) control target group policy, and (5) tenure system. Also from literature review and expert verification, the nine assessment criteria which are constructed and divided into 3 groups related to three main parties in low-income housing development are (1) affordability, accessibility, and availability for low-income people (2) profitability, availability, accessibility of incentives for private developers (3) sustainability, effectiveness, and inclusiveness.

2. Investigate current practices of public private partnership in low-income housing development in Vietnam

Many issues related to government support for private sector, imposition on developers, subsidies for LIP, control of target group, and tenure system in Vietnam. Facing the problem related to government support, private developers in Vietnam cannot receive some important incentives such as land and financing subsidies which are promised to give by government. The maximum profit margin of 10% and minimum cost recovery at least for 10 years for both hire-purchase and installment payment or for 20 years for rental houses make this market segment unattractive to private sector. The minimum planning and designing standard, and controlling maximum profit margin are lack of detail guideline for public authority and private developer during implementation. The housing finance subsidy in government policy is not strong to provide affordable loan condition to low-income people. Moreover, the loan condition actual provided to LIP is less favorable than what is introduced in policy. Because of under-table money using in allocation system and lack of detailed guidelines to prevent resale and renting out allocated units, most of the housing units are occupied by ineligible people. The actual tenure system is less favorable to low-income people than the imposed tenure system in government policy due to lack of profit in planning tenure system of government policy.

3. Assess the current practice of public private partnership in low-income housing development in Vietnam

Most low-income people in Vietnam face difficulty in affording payment condition and serving debt due to high debt service, high portion of down payment, and high housing price. The quantity of housing available to LIP is low, and the housing finance subsidy is also low in term of both quantity and quality. Housing subsidies including low-income housing subsidized units, housing finance and subsidized information is difficult to access for LIP. The low-profit margin and long term cost recovery set by government is not attractive for private participation. Some important incentives such as off-take guarantee and faster legislation procedure are not introduced in government policy and most incentives in government regulation are not provided in reality. Moreover, most provided incentives such as tax, financing, and basis infrastructure are not given to developer because they are not included in project cost when calculating profit margin. Complex legislation procedure in receiving incentives makes it difficult for developer to access these incentives. The LIH program does not provide housing for migrant and not focus on non-government officials due to its strict selection criteria, and does not cover other housing need due to unsuitable minimum design standard. Another issue related to effectiveness of program is that it is not effective in attracting private participation due to low profit set by government, reducing housing price because of the profit margin ceiling policy, and allocating housing to eligible people due to under-table money using and unclear controlling guideline after sale. Because of its low actual incentives and low actual subsidies provided, the financial sustainability of government budget is not affected much.
His thesis abstract is copied and posted.

ABSTRACT

One of global problem is inadequate condition of urban housing, and it is most serious issues in developing countries. The pressing issue of Vietnam at the mean time is providing adequate housing for residents, especially for poor people living in urban area. In order to reduce state budget investment in housing development for the poor, Vietnam government is currently seeking possible solutions to develop public private partnership in low-income housing development. However, it is still lack of public private partnership in low-income housing development even though government has implemented incentives policy to encourage private participation since 2001. The purpose of this study is seeking possible solution to develop practice of public private partnership in low-income housing development.

This research was conducted by case study methodology to fulfill four study objectives. Firstly, general framework and its assessment criteria for public private partnership in low-income housing development were developed and verified by expert. Secondly, the current practices of public private partnership in low-income housing development in Vietnam are investigated base on developed general framework. Thirdly, following developed assessment criteria, the current practices of public private partnership in low-income housing development in Vietnam are assessed. Fourthly, recommendation for setting up applicable public private partnership in low-income housing development in Vietnam is made.

The result of this study found there is a big gap between government policy and actual implementation of public private partnership in low-income housing development in Vietnam. The government program is not effective in solving housing needs. Low-income people still face difficult in buying the houses. The low-income housing market is not attractive to private developer. Housing finance institute, housing saving fund, and national housing authority are recommended to be set up and play important roles in supporting both demand side and supply side of low-income housing market.