Friday, 22 June 2012


FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT FOR URBAN
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
USING LOAN FROM OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISSTANCE (ODA).
A CASE STUDY OF LAOCAI CITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FUNDED BY WORLD BANK


by


Nguyen Viet Cuong


Abstract


The development of socio-economic infrastructure plays a very important role in the country developing strategy, it is a major factor to help developing country reducing the poverty. The fund for the infrastructure development can be from many sources: private sector, counterpart, mixed credit and ODA loan…In order to meet the huge demand on infrastructure project development, the preparations of project investment such as project feasibility study is specially paid attention by Project Management Units.
Furthermore, with the project using the loan from international Donors, the feasibility study is not limited in project financial aspects like loss or profit, it also studies the other social aspect such as safeguard policies, economic benefits, benefit to the residents within project… The project feasibility study report therefore also be considered as approved factor for the Donor to give the loan.
The purpose of this study is to identify the process to prepare a feasibility study report for the urban infrastructure development project using the loan from World Bank. this process of preparing feasibility study report need to be followed the government instruction as well as complying with the World Bank regulation.   



Executive summary  

Rationale of research
This research has been conducted to indentify the course of action to prepare feasibility study report for the urban infrastructure development project using loan from World Bank.

Objectives of study
To prepare feasibility study report following guidelines of five funding agencies (Asian development Bank, French Agency, World Bank, Japan Bank for International Cooperation, German Bank for Reconstruction) to identify risk of unrealistic FS report preparation and to analyze problem during preparation of FS report.

Methodology
In this research methods are followed in accordance with the five funding agencies i-e step by step completion of FS report from collection of data to provincial people approval and World Bank non-objection letter.

Findings and conclusion
Apart from the project financial advantages, the significant advantage from project implementation is that the Project Owner and project shareholders particularly the Consultants are approached to the international standards in project preparation and implementation. Report helps in making decision of either invest or not to invest for construction.
The project shareholders, at any time during project implementation, must take note on the compliance of Donor’s guidelines, as World Bank specialists supervises strictly the project implementation to ensure the effectiveness of fund usage and development criteria are complied.
The project FS report has to be prepared in compliance with both Lender’s guideline and Governmental rule and regulation. This appears to be the biggest challenge for the Project Owner and FS Consultant, that why the selection of FS Consultant need to be always considered carefully with the Non-objection from the Donors.
The other issues such as the sustainable development and Community Awareness in sanitation and environment, institution and capacity building also need to be considered carefully and differently from the normal construction investment project
During the FS preparation stage, the difficulties will be occurred due the lack of experience in project management from project owner to this new concept of total project development, thus, the improvement of project communication and information sharing must be paid attention to avoid the unnecessary delay.

Recommendations
The FS report is more difficult and complicated when compared with commercial project report. The main procedure and guidelines are defined by donor agency and lenders criteria, so I can only give my recommendations to prepare reliable FS report using World Bank loan in particular.
·         Project management unit should be set up at early stage; matrix structure under control of provincial leader.
·         The more accurate data, the more reliable report will be so need of proper survey team and procedure.
·         As FS report preparation will be in direct supervision of World Bank so consultant need to have experience of working with WB and have experience in development of similar projects.
·          As FS preparation team is different from presentation team to World Bank expert, so there is need of proper communication system among stakeholders it can be done by telecom conference with minute notes. 

No comments: