A
RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR HIGHWAY
CONSTRUCTION
COMPANIES IN VIETNAM
By
Pham
Quang Cuong
Abstract
Highway
construction industry is long known to contain more risks than many other
industries because of the effect of a variety of uncontrollable factors and the
severe competition degree. However currently in Vietnam the understanding of
highway construction companies about risk management is very poor, lacking of a
clear identification of risks and the methods to deal with these risks
systematically. The purpose of this study is to identify and rank the risks
facing the highway construction companies as well as to determine the risk
responses that effectively help the contractors to handle them.
This
research is based on quantitative method, using questionnaire for data
collection and utilizing SPSS software to analyze the data.
The
respondents in this research are directors and experienced project managers
from sixty different contractors. The respondents are asked to assess the risks
and the degree of the application of risk responses in their company as well as
to provide the information related to the corporate performance. The risks
afterwards are ranked in terms of probability of occurrence, severity and
impact and then the risk responses with strong correlation with corporate
performance are pointed out.
The
outcome of data analysis is the ranking of risks that will help increase the
attention of the Vietnamese contractors to the critical ones which might
threaten their project success.
The
effective risk responses with strong correlation with project performance are
listed and are put into the relevant stages of project life cycle to form the
risk response framework.
This
framework can be considered as an action guide that the highway construction
companies should apply as strong as they can to make their projects more
secured against the risks.
Executive summary
Rationale
of research
This research has been conducted to develop frame work for risk management
in high way construction projects in Vietnam.
Objectives
of study
To identify major risks & emerging risk to highways
contractors, risk responses and its relation with company’s corporate
performance and to develop a framework for highway contractors.
Methodology
The
exploratory research method is used to study risk management in highway construction
companies, through literature review, case study from Vietnam.
Findings
and conclusion
The
first objective is to assess the risks in terms of probability of occurrence;
severity and impact, afterwards the ranking of risks are made in order to
increase the contractors’ awareness towards critical ones. The second objective
is to examine the application of risk responses which are developed through a
deep literature review and interviews with Vietnamese experts. The risk
responses will be evaluated based on the belief that the contractors with good
performance will have better responses to risks and in turn, the good risk
responses will enhance the performance of the contractors at both project level
and corporate level.
As
a result the correlation between the application of risk responses and the
corporate performance is analyzed and the ones with the correlation coefficient
larger than 0.7 are pointed out. The final objective is to put the effective
risk responses into the relevant stages of project cycle to form the risk
response frame work that can be applied by highway contractors to their
projects.
Critical
risks
The
analysis result reveals the fact that the unstable economic conditions and the macroeconomic
factors such as high inflation (rank 1), high interest rate (rank 2) are putting
a lot of difficulties upon the highway contractors. Other big concerns come
from the owners including Delay in delivering the site (rank 3), delay in
progress payment (rank 4) and financial difficulties (rank 5). In top 15 of
critical risks, there are some risks resulted from the poor management of the
contractors themselves including Shortage of cash flow (rank 6), Too low
bidding price under competition (rank 7), Inappropriate construction methods
(rank 9), Poor performance of sub-contractors and suppliers (rank 10) and Poor quality
and rework (rank 11). Consultants are an important party in projects and they contribute
some significant risks to the work of contractors namely Site condition discrepancy
(rank8) and Delay in testing and acceptance procedure of supervisors (rank 13).
Effective
risk responses and risk response framework
The
risk responses that can be applied to deal with every single risk are discussed
in depth and the effective one which have the strong correlation with the corporate
performance are pointed out. These risk responses are grouped into action categories
and are put into the relevant stages of project lifecycle with the hope to
provide a more systematic approach to these risks. The data analysis and the interview
with experienced experts during data collection reveal many weaknesses of the contractors
that make them vulnerable to risks. The cost estimate is the first thing that requires
the more careful consideration and preparation of the contractors because it directly
relates to the chance of winning the contract and the profitability of their
work.
The
contract content is another problem to the contractors because if the
contractual clauses are provided poor and unclear they will become the source
of many risks in the next stages. In the opinions of many respondents the
contract in highway projects are still in a very low level in comparison with
the contractual form suggested by FIDIC. The quality of construction planning
and the tight construction control play the important role to mitigate or even
eliminate the impact of many risks especially the on-site risks.