In any construction projects, conflicts exist. The bigger the projects are, the more it face many disagreements. Dam construction project involve multidisciplinary teams and interdisciplinary activities. The limited time and physical resources has added the another complexity to the construction process. Different stakeholders have different objectives, perception and priorities. The difference in attitudes often creates conflict (Awakul and Ogunlana, 2002a) and as a result of which most of the projects are set aside at the planning stage whereas others are subject to conflicts during the execution stage causing enormous time and cost overruns.
Mr. Braj Kishor Mahato made a case study on Conflict Dynamics in Dam Construction Projects in Middle Marsyangdi Hydroelectric Project in Nepal which aimed to develop a model for comprehensive and integrated approach of conflict management to manage the conflicts effectively, efficiently and equitably early in a project’s life using system dynamic modeling technique.
His study’s overall objective is to thoroughly understand and develop a simulation model for comprehensive, integrated and proactive approach of conflict management in dam construction project. The model will be helpful for project manager to assess and take proactive measures to manage the conflicts effectively, efficiently and equitably early in a project’s life. However, his study’s three specific objectives are to (1) identify and explore pertinent conflict factors in dam construction projects; (2) develop a model to understand the dynamics of conflict in dam construction project using system dynamics modeling technique; and (3) use the model to derive viable policies for minimization of conflict at construction stage in dam construction projects.
His major conclusions made in this study are as follows:
1. Most interesting fact found from model simulation is intensive public hearing prior to final decision at earlier stage surges conflict forward and minimize overall conflict at later stage.
2. Discloser of project related data to project stakeholder is not only surging conflict forward but also reducing it at construction stage.
3. Intensive public participation at early stage of project will decrease over all interface conflict in project. Public participation and consultation at early stage of project guarantying access to all stakeholders including disclosure of all data, both positive and negative, for public knowledge will reduce the anxiety of local people about the project and establish transparency beyond suspicion which will reduce confrontation at later stage.
4. It may be concluded from the simulation that discrepancy in compensation payment, resettlement and support programs can be minimized by effectively involving project-affected people in formulation and implementation of compensation, resettlement and support program
5. Proper implementation of programs related with resettlement of project affected people (project employment, compensation payment, support programs) will reduce interface conflict at later stage of project.
6. Increasing monitoring and reporting surge interface conflict slightly forward which will give opportunity to project team to take proactive action.
His thesis abstract is copied and posted.
ABSTRACT
Interface conflict is identified as one of the major problem in dam construction projects. Differences in attitude and interest often create conflict as a result of which many projects are set aside at planning stage whereas others are subject to conflict during execution stage. Conflict in execution stage causes prolonged delay, enormous cost overrun and at worst abandon of project. Proper management of conflict can determine success or failure of a project. Thus it is crucial to identify the root-causes of interface conflict in present and past project to avoid such problems in future. Qualitative data gathered from the case studies, interviews conducted in Nepal and an intensive literature review has helped to develop a system dynamic model to explore and examine full context of interface conflict theoretically and practically in dam construction project. Reference mode approach was used in modeling based on literature and expert views on the typical evolution of key indicators of interface conflict. This study discusses factors that influence development of interface conflict in dam construction project in Nepalese context.
This study reveals that interface conflict at construction stage of project is caused by lack of effective public hearing prior to making final decision, public participation and information disclosure at early stage of project, insufficient education and training program, discrepancy in compensation payment, resettlement and support programs. Public involvement and mutual consultation considering guaranteed access to all stakeholders, public hearing prior to final decision will increase the public acceptance of the project. It will be easier to reach on agreement on conflicting issues when the stakeholders are well informed and empowered. Disclosure of accurate and timely information for public knowledge will reduce the anxiety of local people about the project and establish transparency beyond suspicion.
Discrepancy in compensation payment, resettlement and support programs can be minimized by (i) effectively involving project-affected people in formulation and implementation of compensation and resettlement program (ii) formulating comprehensive and inclusive national policy to resettlement issues in dam construction project. Education, training and support programs to the project-affected people will provide opportunity to restore their livelihood and create positive perception of community about dam project. Study also identified that monitoring and reporting will allow for identifying success stories to be replicated and avoiding the failure, which will ultimately decrease the negative perception of community about dam project. This will reduce interface conflict in future dam construction project.
No comments:
Post a Comment