Since the 1990s,
Vietnam began integrating into the world economy, the Government has boosted
infrastructure investment with many capital sources such as government budget,
government bonds, ODA loans, etc. Although the country has gained great
achievements, but the quality of these infrastructure projects is also an issue
being debated, especially in foreign-invested projects designed and constructed
by the well-known main consultants and main contractors in the world. Series of
works having trouble in construction as well as operation, such as:
- The collapse
side span of Can Tho Bridge in 2007
-Cracked appear
at four submerged segments of Thu Thiem Tunnel in 2008
-Serious
landslide on the Ho Chi Minh Route during operation in 2009
-Serious
settlement and crack at Thanh Tri bridge project in 2011
-Settlement and
crack on Cầu Giẽ - Ninh Bình Expressway in 2012
-Crack and
settlement at Cai Rang bridge in Can Tho city in 2013
-Crack and
settlement at East-West Highway project in 2013
Causes of these incidents have been explained or are
being studied, which do not exclude the errors caused in design stage and
supervision stage.
Loss because of problems in construction is usually
great, so every employer wants to control the quality as soon as possible in
order to eliminate the problems which can be anticipated. Through the project
life cycle, risk and uncertainty at conceptual and design stage completely
dominate other stages, so quality management in design stage is efficient.
Moreover, according to Project Management for Construction: Fundamental Concepts for
Owners, Engineers, Architects, and Builders by Chris Hendrickson and Tung Au “As with cost control, the most important
decisions regarding the quality of a completed facility are made during the
design and planning stages rather than during construction”. Therefore,
quality management system is strongly necessary for not only the contractor but
also the consultant to assure quality and prevent any unexpected problems.
However, now the local consulting firms do not
really understand the meaning of the quality management system. Many companies
simply think that QMS certificate is an amulet, which will give them
competitive advantage in bidding. And most local consultant firms focus pay
more attention to the profit but less to the quality.
Mr. Nguyen Quoc Huy made a case study which main
objective to develop a quality management system for a consultant
firm in design phase, which specified to infrastructure project in Vietnam,
focusing mainly on four issues as follows:
(i)
study of the theory and practices of project quality management in design
phase;
(ii)
evaluation of practical design quality in Southern Coastal Corridor Project;
(iii)
analysis of the strength and weakness of quality in design;
(iv)
lessons learnt and recommendations from the quality of design.
Design quality management is a significant factor affecting not only the
design performance but also the construction performance and operation &
maintenance. However, there are a few clients and consultant companies being
aware of the important of quality management in design project in Vietnam.
Therefore, great expenditures of money, time and resources are wasted every
year due to non-existent or inefficient quality management. Reasons for this
might be stated as follows: clients and consultants lack experience;
construction market in Vietnam does not have enough transparency for fair
competition; project management level is limited. Although many consultant
companies in Vietnam have established their quality management systems
according to TCVN ISO 9001:2008 as a movement, a few of them carry out study
careful how to measure the effective of these quality management systems in
their company, and what key performance indicators can be apply to increase the
effective of their quality management system.
In order to achieve sustainable development in construction market,
consultant companies must apply quality management in design. Objectives of the
application quality management in the design are not only satisfying customer
requirements, meeting the requirements of the regulatory and statutory, making
benefits for clients and the community but also contributing enhanced the
position of the company in the market. Quality management also helps to
increase productivity of design engineers, decrease operation cost of design
offices, improve service reliability, and provide an essential environment for
technology advancement and innovation. With the desire to understand deeply the
quality management in design, the existing practice design project - Southern Coastal
Corridor – is studied. From this study, the strength and weakness of quality
management in this project are identified and clarified, and lessons learned
will be useful for future projects. Some main strength aspects in this project
are management commitment at project level, establishing detailed document
control procedure, and setting up a clear project organization chart. While
there are many weakness aspects such as: does not have quality, quality policy,
quality procedure, quality planning, customer focus, value engineering,
monitoring and measurement, control of non-confirming product, analysis data,
and improvement; design review just is formalistic; does not mobilize competent
experts and useful design softwares.
In order to apply successfully quality management in design, project
manager or team leader and administrators should consider some following
factors
-
Management commitment on
quality and continuous quality improvement should be established. Top managers
must participate in development and implementation process.
-
Defining the requirements of
the client as clear as possible, and as soon as possible will help to implement
project smoothly. Define characteristics of project, analysis the present
situation of project, identify problems root causes and their effects, and
develop plan for corrective action.
-
Engineers must be instructed
with the basics of quality management. Training and education about practice
and theory of quality management at all level and in all phase are essential.
-
Teamwork should be
encouraged to facilitate every engineer could get enough assistance to be
successful individual. Improved quality performance must be implemented for the
whole project team.
-
Statistical methods are the
useful tool for monitoring and improving quality. Expenditure for measurement
to achieve quality should be considered as an investment, because the companies
which supply high quality services can enhance their competition and increase
their revenue.
-
Design engineers must learn,
understand and be familiar with contemporary construction techniques and
construction materials. Then they can design projects constructible in terms of
building.
This research is done in terms of design phase of a project. But in a project,
there include other phases such as feasibility study, bidding, construction and
supervision, and operation & maintenance. In order to have a complete
picture about quality management of construction consultant organizations as
well as to achieve successful in implementation quality management in
construction, further study should be done for other phases of project,
especially in feasibility study phase and supervision phase.
His thesis abstract
is copied below.
Abstract
Why do most of clients just concentrate
on the quality in the construction stage? It is too late. Clients should
control the quality from the input, and especially from the design phase.
Because the more allocation during the design phase affects about 80% the cost,
the project might save investment cost as well as avoid the unfortunate
consequences later.
The study aims to assess the strength
and weakness of project quality management in the design phase. The scope of
study was limited in design organization specified in infrastructure work in
Vietnam. Cross literature was reviewed and real case analysis was implemented
in order to find out the strength and weakness of quality management, then
lessons learned for design process. Another objective of this study is
providing project managers, design engineers and who concerned a practice
knowledge of quality management in design in order to help them manage the
project, achieving the high quality outcome.
The result of this study shows that both
client and consultant in the studied project still concentrate more on the cost
and budget than the quality although this is a significant project funded by
ADB and AUSAID. The study also recommends some work instructions for improving
quality in the design phase. Design quality can only be improved when clients
and consultant firms change their attitude toward quality management.