Recently,
delays occur commonly in almost all projects in Vietnam. So they become a big
problem mostly for every project where good or suitable solutions are not
always used. In the project implementing phase, anticipating the factors causing
delays is one of the important scopes of project manager. Therefore, project
managers need to understand and analyze the causes of delays before giving
reasonable solutions prior to construction commencement. Normally, the prominent
characteristic difference between infrastructure project and office building
project is that road or highway connects many locations together so that it
needs a lot of time to discuss, communicate and negotiate with local residents
living inside or along the project, while this issue is not existing in the office
building project. However, in Vietnam, for infrastructure construction project,
the owner doesn’t pay enough time and cost for detailed investigations or land
acquisition for good planning in schedule and budget prior to performance, but
the project implemention and land acquisition are doing at the same time popularly. Consequently, land acquisition
caused delay in this performing time very prominently.
Besides,
there are also many other factors causing delays in this kind of project such
as design changes, price fluctuation, delay in sub-construction work, etc. These
factors are necessary to address to find out the reasons and solution for each
case. Finally, all are needed for all involved parties to learn the lessons for
their success in the future.
Mr. Tran Le Minh Triet made a case study to find out the major events causing the delay and
consequential effects at construction stage. These events were analyzed in
different prospect of the owner, contractor, designer and consultant. Then,
recommendations of mitigation of delays are proposed for future construction
projects. For this reason, this study aimed to:
1. find out some delay factors in an
infrastructure project and to analyze the relationship of these factors
2. give suggestion for prevention from delays, by
the way to extract the lessons for experience.
For the
client, the reason such as slow decision making process is also difficult to
improve in the developing country like Vietnam. Besides, for the contractor, other
reasons such as poor site management and supervision; delay in sub-contraction
work; inadequate experience of the main contractor and delay in a new material
approved by the engineer are usually happened to both inexperienced and
experienced contractors. Also, many delays will arise many claims later. Finally,
recommendations common to the above mentioned are both general and from
experience. Hopefully, these can used in consideration with the real conditions
in order to make it more real in similar projects. To
avoid or/and mitigate delay, working plan is prepared carefully for inevitable
project setbacks and good collaborative project management will facilitate and
ensure minimal project delays.
His
thesis abstract is copied below.
Abstract
In
construction industry, a successful project normally meets 3 basic
requirements. It meets time requirements within the budget, required quality
specifications and safety requirements in the operation. Unfortunately, the
highway Noi Bai-Lao Cai project-package A3 under construction has the progress
behind schedule in the terms of project performance due to some problems in
project management where there are many causes leading to partial delays and
overall project delay. Lessons learnt from these problems have become essential
for successful project managers. Generally, the problems involved with project
delays are solvable. To know how for solving problems, the critical factors
impacting negatively on the phase of project performance need to be discovered
and identified for analysis.
This
report will present the basic types of delays and analyze ten reasons causing
the delay problems in the highway Noi Bai-Lao Cai project-package A3 in the
North Viet Nam. The method applied to analyze the delays based on the 4 ways to
categorize delays of Theodore J. Trauner, Jr., PE, PP (Construction delays, 1990)
to conduct the objective of the study.
Finally,
some suggestions dealing with project delay problems and lessons learnt in the project
executing stage are proposed.
No comments:
Post a Comment