DELAYS IN FLOOD PREVENTION PROJECTS
A
CASE STUDY OF URBAN DRAINAGE PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT
By
Le Do
Abstract
Currently,
the overload on drainage of the existing systems along with the development of
the increasing urbanization of the big cities like Ho Chi Minh City has led to
flooding on many streets, with the level of flood is wider and heavier day by
day. One of the issues affected by flood that is the congestion and traffic
jams on the roads of Ho Chi Minh City’s areas, which has caused pressing and
affect the economic and social activities, life environment and the daily
activities of people traveling in the region.
In the
recent period, the city government also is trying to invest in renovating and
upgrading of infrastructure for roads and drainage in the areas of Ho Chi Minh.
Typically, a water infrastructure projects have been implemented on a large
scale, specifically: Ho Chi Minh City Environmental Sanitation Project Basin
Nhieu Loc - Thi Nghe; Ho Chi Minh City Water Environmental Sanitation Project
Basin Tau Hu - Ben Nghe - Kenh Te - Kenh Doi; Canal Tan Hoa – Lo Gom Sanitation
and Urban Upgrading Project, etc.
However, in
the process of implementation has encountered many difficulties such as the
construction schedule are affected because the infrastructure systems are not
controlled, the weak contractor capacity, capital limited investment. Besides,
the function of our State Management is loose, many duplicate projects which we
call "walked together" projects, plus with the investment does not
spread as a strategy or a specific plan has made to a waste of investment. All
of these are leaving a result, an issue that needs attention and consideration,
which is effective in the management of construction and drainage in the areas
of Ho Chi Minh City.
Facing this
reality, those problems require the city authorities need to organize and
research actively, inspection and review the city’s management and construction
drainage system now. That work to ensure if they has consistent and effective
in the current development phase to propose remedies and the develop
orientation in the management of construction and drainage system in the
future. Besides improving project schedules is the most important in order to
solve aspiration of urban residents. That is why I chose this topic for my last
case study.
Executive summary
Rationale of research
This research has been conducted to identify delay factors in
flood prevention projects.
Objectives of study
To study and analyze
delay situation in past flood prevention projects at construction sage and
analyzing activities causing delay in projects in government funded projects
Methodology
The
exploratory research method is used to review theory of flood prevention
projects in Ho Chi Minh City from 2008-2011.
Findings and conclusion
In Flood
Prevention Projects, contractors seldom cause critical delays. It is easy to
understand this problem. Work characteristics are not complicated and
contractors set too much task durations. Therefore, they always have extra time
to finish tasks. However, they never try their bests to reduce project
durations. This is a problem that schedulers must pay attention.
In the other
hand, critical delays are caused by lacking corporation between government
operators. This problem is a general disadvantage that government authority
always tries to improve. In my opinion, it is proceed from organization
culture.
Recommendation
For heavy rain
·
Need to plan master schedule in accordance with rainy
season (May-October) to avoid delay.
·
Contractor must prepare pumping to solve storm water in
excavation. Besides SCFC force contractors equip pumping to help owner solve
emergency situations at flooded streets.
·
To avoid bad weather conditions, using new technology
construction such as: Cured-In-Place Pipe, (CIPP) technology and Pipe – Jacking
technology. However, It is not used for small projects because of its
expensiveness.
For catching infrastructure systems
·
For
long term: building digital infrastructure map to be prepared and use of new
technologies.
·
For
short term: Strict co-ordination with the parties associated is required.
For waiting sewage connection
·
Setting contingency duration in schedule.
·
Setting project end date for project.
For lack of contractor capability
·
Apply modern project management skills
·
Change of direct contracting methods
·
Strict supervision.
Future research
In this case study, we only discuss about delays in construction stages. However, because of lacking databases and time, case study still has some defections. Actually, in conceptual and design stages, owners and approval organization always cause critical delays. The main reasons are unsuitable organizations, extra-complicated approval process and bad master planning.
In the order hand, databases that we collected are not much. Therefore, the statistic is not quite exact. In future, SCFC will run more and more projects to prevent with climate change. Certainly,
No comments:
Post a Comment